How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Ecuador?

63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chile vs Ecuador: Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of

Chile

0 kg per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Ecuador

0 kg per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Chile rank

92nd

Ecuador rank

93rd

Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of over time

Chile
Ecuador

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0 kg per US$ of GDP against 0 kg per US$ of GDP in Ecuador, a difference of 0 kg per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Chile ranks 92nd and Ecuador ranks 93rd of 149 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Ecuador in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chile	Ecuador	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	Ecuador
1970s	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	Ecuador
1980s	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	Ecuador
1990s	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	Ecuador
2000s	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	Ecuador
2010s	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	Ecuador
2020s	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, breeding — losses from manure treated (n content), per unit of, Chile or Ecuador?: Chile, at 0 kg per US$ of GDP against 0 kg per US$ of GDP in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, breeding — losses from manure treated (n content), per unit of between Chile and Ecuador?: 0 kg per US$ of GDP, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Ecuador?: 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Ecuador rank globally for swine, breeding — losses from manure treated (n content), per unit of?: Chile ranks 92nd and Ecuador ranks 93rd of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Ecuador: Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/chile/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/chile/ecuador/">Chile vs Ecuador: Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP
Unit: kg per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 151 places, 8,190 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.