Ecuador vs New Caledonia: Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated

Ecuador
48,410 kg
in 2023
New Caledonia
49,401 kg
in 2023
Ecuador rank
84th
New Caledonia rank
83rd

Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated over time

  • Ecuador
  • New Caledonia
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k196119922023

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 49,401 kg against 48,410 kg in Ecuador, a difference of 991 kg.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 84th and New Caledonia ranks 83rd of 172 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1960s 78,432 kg 25,941 kg 52,491 kg Ecuador
1970s 124,269 kg 26,986 kg 97,282 kg Ecuador
1980s 137,046 kg 40,658 kg 96,388 kg Ecuador
1990s 121,780 kg 38,270 kg 83,509 kg Ecuador
2000s 69,209 kg 40,385 kg 28,824 kg Ecuador
2010s 68,641 kg 48,322 kg 20,318 kg Ecuador
2020s 49,702 kg 49,169 kg 532.75 kg Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, breeding — losses from manure treated, Ecuador or New Caledonia?
New Caledonia, at 49,401 kg against 48,410 kg in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, breeding — losses from manure treated between Ecuador and New Caledonia?
991 kg, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and New Caledonia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and New Caledonia rank globally for swine, breeding — losses from manure treated?
Ecuador ranks 84th and New Caledonia ranks 83rd of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs New Caledonia: Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/ecuador/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/ecuador/new-caledonia/">Ecuador vs New Caledonia: Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).