Ecuador vs Zambia: Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated

Ecuador
48,410 kg
in 2023
Zambia
41,167 kg
in 2023
Ecuador rank
84th
Zambia rank
87th

Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated over time

  • Ecuador
  • Zambia
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 48,410 kg against 41,167 kg in Zambia, a difference of 7,243 kg.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.2 times Zambia's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 84th and Zambia ranks 87th of 172 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 78,432 kg 2,783 kg 75,649 kg Ecuador
1970s 124,269 kg 5,555 kg 118,714 kg Ecuador
1980s 137,046 kg 7,303 kg 129,743 kg Ecuador
1990s 121,780 kg 10,582 kg 111,198 kg Ecuador
2000s 69,209 kg 14,200 kg 55,010 kg Ecuador
2010s 68,641 kg 37,955 kg 30,686 kg Ecuador
2020s 49,702 kg 40,478 kg 9,224 kg Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, breeding — losses from manure treated, Ecuador or Zambia?
Ecuador, at 48,410 kg against 41,167 kg in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, breeding — losses from manure treated between Ecuador and Zambia?
7,243 kg, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Zambia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Zambia rank globally for swine, breeding — losses from manure treated?
Ecuador ranks 84th and Zambia ranks 87th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Zambia: Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/ecuador/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/ecuador/zambia/">Ecuador vs Zambia: Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).