El Salvador vs Zimbabwe: Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated

El Salvador
12,138 kg
in 2023
Zimbabwe
12,505 kg
in 2023
El Salvador rank
112th
Zimbabwe rank
111th

Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated over time

  • El Salvador
  • Zimbabwe
5.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k30.0k196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 12,505 kg against 12,138 kg in El Salvador, a difference of 367 kg.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was El Salvador ahead.

El Salvador ranks 112th and Zimbabwe ranks 111th of 172 countries.

El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 19,699 kg 4,846 kg 14,853 kg El Salvador
1970s 22,969 kg 6,743 kg 16,225 kg El Salvador
1980s 19,057 kg 6,915 kg 12,141 kg El Salvador
1990s 12,248 kg 9,218 kg 3,030 kg El Salvador
2000s 18,176 kg 8,535 kg 9,641 kg El Salvador
2010s 14,020 kg 10,503 kg 3,517 kg El Salvador
2020s 12,138 kg 10,968 kg 1,170 kg El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, breeding — losses from manure treated, El Salvador or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 12,505 kg against 12,138 kg in El Salvador as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, breeding — losses from manure treated between El Salvador and Zimbabwe?
367 kg, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do El Salvador and Zimbabwe rank globally for swine, breeding — losses from manure treated?
El Salvador ranks 112th and Zimbabwe ranks 111th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Zimbabwe: Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/el-salvador/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/el-salvador/zimbabwe/">El Salvador vs Zimbabwe: Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).