Eswatini vs Suriname: Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated

Eswatini
1,603 kg
in 2023
Suriname
1,648 kg
in 2023
Eswatini rank
136th
Suriname rank
135th

Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated over time

  • Eswatini
  • Suriname
05001.0k1.5k2.0k196119922023

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 1,648 kg against 1,603 kg in Eswatini, a difference of 45 kg.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 136th and Suriname ranks 135th of 172 countries.

Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 341.52 kg 449.32 kg 107.8 kg Suriname
1970s 560.48 kg 831.21 kg 270.74 kg Suriname
1980s 605.2 kg 1,009 kg 404.25 kg Suriname
1990s 1,022 kg 1,311 kg 288.64 kg Suriname
2000s 1,175 kg 1,274 kg 99.39 kg Suriname
2010s 1,310 kg 1,676 kg 365.91 kg Suriname
2020s 1,637 kg 1,681 kg 44.45 kg Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, breeding — losses from manure treated, Eswatini or Suriname?
Suriname, at 1,648 kg against 1,603 kg in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, breeding — losses from manure treated between Eswatini and Suriname?
45 kg, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Suriname?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Suriname rank globally for swine, breeding — losses from manure treated?
Eswatini ranks 136th and Suriname ranks 135th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Suriname: Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/eswatini/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/eswatini/suriname/">Eswatini vs Suriname: Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).