Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Papua New Guinea: Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated
Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated over time
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 2.82 million kg against 1.37 million kg in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 1.45 million kg.
That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 2.1 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 22nd and Papua New Guinea ranks 24th of 33 groups.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 281,176 kg | 847,363 kg | 566,188 kg | Papua New Guinea |
| 1970s | 439,933 kg | 1.03 million kg | 590,964 kg | Papua New Guinea |
| 1980s | 574,748 kg | 1.23 million kg | 650,598 kg | Papua New Guinea |
| 1990s | 658,472 kg | 1.72 million kg | 1.06 million kg | Papua New Guinea |
| 2000s | 756,376 kg | 2.35 million kg | 1.60 million kg | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 1.06 million kg | 2.65 million kg | 1.59 million kg | Papua New Guinea |
| 2020s | 1.34 million kg | 2.76 million kg | 1.42 million kg | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher swine, breeding — losses from manure treated, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 2.82 million kg against 1.37 million kg in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in swine, breeding — losses from manure treated between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Papua New Guinea?
- 1.45 million kg, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Papua New Guinea?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Papua New Guinea rank globally for swine, breeding — losses from manure treated?
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 22nd and Papua New Guinea ranks 24th of 33 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).