Puerto Rico vs Tokelau: Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated

Puerto Rico
2,045 kg
in 2023
Tokelau
3,069 kg
in 2023
Puerto Rico rank
132nd
Tokelau rank
130th

Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated over time

  • Puerto Rico
  • Tokelau
05.0k10.0k15.0k196119922023

How they compare

Tokelau currently reports 3,069 kg against 2,045 kg in Puerto Rico, a difference of 1,024 kg.

That makes Tokelau's figure about 1.5 times Puerto Rico's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Puerto Rico ahead.

Puerto Rico ranks 132nd and Tokelau ranks 130th of 172 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Puerto Rico averaged higher in 6 and Tokelau in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Puerto Rico Tokelau Difference Ahead
1960s 8,423 kg 864.36 kg 7,559 kg Puerto Rico
1970s 11,824 kg 1,218 kg 10,606 kg Puerto Rico
1980s 10,211 kg 1,351 kg 8,860 kg Puerto Rico
1990s 8,938 kg 1,318 kg 7,620 kg Puerto Rico
2000s 3,419 kg 1,318 kg 2,100 kg Puerto Rico
2010s 2,240 kg 1,491 kg 748.97 kg Puerto Rico
2020s 2,045 kg 3,730 kg 1,686 kg Tokelau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, breeding — losses from manure treated, Puerto Rico or Tokelau?
Tokelau, at 3,069 kg against 2,045 kg in Puerto Rico as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, breeding — losses from manure treated between Puerto Rico and Tokelau?
1,024 kg, with Tokelau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Puerto Rico and Tokelau?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Puerto Rico and Tokelau rank globally for swine, breeding — losses from manure treated?
Puerto Rico ranks 132nd and Tokelau ranks 130th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Puerto Rico vs Tokelau: Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/puerto-rico-us/tokelau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/puerto-rico-us/tokelau/">Puerto Rico vs Tokelau: Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).