Ecuador vs Suriname: Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils (N content), per capita

Ecuador
0.031 kg per person
in 2023
Suriname
0.0302 kg per person
in 2023
Ecuador rank
88th
Suriname rank
91st

Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils (N content), per capita over time

  • Ecuador
  • Suriname
00.050.10.150.20.25196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0.031 kg per person against 0.0302 kg per person in Suriname, a difference of 0.0008 kg per person.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 88th and Suriname ranks 91st of 149 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1695 kg per person 0.0163 kg per person 0.1533 kg per person Ecuador
1970s 0.202 kg per person 0.0247 kg per person 0.1773 kg per person Ecuador
1980s 0.1758 kg per person 0.03 kg per person 0.1458 kg per person Ecuador
1990s 0.1225 kg per person 0.0353 kg per person 0.0872 kg per person Ecuador
2000s 0.0583 kg per person 0.0286 kg per person 0.0298 kg per person Ecuador
2010s 0.0492 kg per person 0.0334 kg per person 0.0158 kg per person Ecuador
2020s 0.0323 kg per person 0.0312 kg per person 0.001 kg per person Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, breeding — manure applied to soils (n content), per capita, Ecuador or Suriname?
Ecuador, at 0.031 kg per person against 0.0302 kg per person in Suriname as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, breeding — manure applied to soils (n content), per capita between Ecuador and Suriname?
0.0008 kg per person, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Suriname?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Suriname rank globally for swine, breeding — manure applied to soils (n content), per capita?
Ecuador ranks 88th and Suriname ranks 91st of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils (N content), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Suriname: Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils (N content), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content-per-capita/ecuador/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content-per-capita/ecuador/suriname/">Ecuador vs Suriname: Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils (N content), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils (N content), per capita
Unit
kg per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils (N content) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.