Bhutan vs Equatorial Guinea: Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square

Bhutan
0.2087 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea
0.1497 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Bhutan rank
127th
Equatorial Guinea rank
129th

Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square over time

  • Bhutan
  • Equatorial Guinea
00.10.20.30.40.5196119922023

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports 0.2087 kg per square kilometre against 0.1497 kg per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.059 kg per square kilometre.

That makes Bhutan's figure about 1.4 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bhutan ahead.

Bhutan ranks 127th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 129th of 149 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 6 and Equatorial Guinea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2749 kg per square kilometre 0.0716 kg per square kilometre 0.2033 kg per square kilometre Bhutan
1970s 0.3003 kg per square kilometre 0.0849 kg per square kilometre 0.2154 kg per square kilometre Bhutan
1980s 0.3645 kg per square kilometre 0.0925 kg per square kilometre 0.272 kg per square kilometre Bhutan
1990s 0.3226 kg per square kilometre 0.1089 kg per square kilometre 0.2137 kg per square kilometre Bhutan
2000s 0.2255 kg per square kilometre 0.1235 kg per square kilometre 0.102 kg per square kilometre Bhutan
2010s 0.1278 kg per square kilometre 0.1366 kg per square kilometre 0.0087 kg per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0.1818 kg per square kilometre 0.1476 kg per square kilometre 0.0342 kg per square kilometre Bhutan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, breeding — manure applied to soils (n content), per square, Bhutan or Equatorial Guinea?
Bhutan, at 0.2087 kg per square kilometre against 0.1497 kg per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, breeding — manure applied to soils (n content), per square between Bhutan and Equatorial Guinea?
0.059 kg per square kilometre, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Equatorial Guinea?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bhutan and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for swine, breeding — manure applied to soils (n content), per square?
Bhutan ranks 127th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 129th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Equatorial Guinea: Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/equatorial-guinea/">Bhutan vs Equatorial Guinea: Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.