China, Hong Kong SAR vs Ethiopia: Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils

China, Hong Kong SAR
23,182 kg
in 2023
Ethiopia
20,732 kg
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
132nd
Ethiopia rank
133rd

Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Ethiopia
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k120.0k196119922023

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 23,182 kg against 20,732 kg in Ethiopia, a difference of 2,450 kg.

That makes China, Hong Kong SAR's figure about 1.1 times Ethiopia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 132nd and Ethiopia ranks 133rd of 172 countries.

China, Hong Kong SAR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Ethiopia Difference Ahead
1990s 27,083 kg 12,414 kg 14,669 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 37,287 kg 15,642 kg 21,645 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s 27,139 kg 18,923 kg 8,217 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 23,182 kg 20,258 kg 2,924 kg China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, breeding — manure applied to soils, China, Hong Kong SAR or Ethiopia?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at 23,182 kg against 20,732 kg in Ethiopia as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, breeding — manure applied to soils between China, Hong Kong SAR and Ethiopia?
2,450 kg, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Ethiopia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Ethiopia rank globally for swine, breeding — manure applied to soils?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 132nd and Ethiopia ranks 133rd of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Ethiopia: Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/china-hong-kong-sar/ethiopia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/china-hong-kong-sar/ethiopia/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Ethiopia: Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).