China, Hong Kong SAR vs Sao Tome and Principe: Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils

China, Hong Kong SAR
23,182 kg
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
24,627 kg
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
132nd
Sao Tome and Principe rank
129th

Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Sao Tome and Principe
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k196119922023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 24,627 kg against 23,182 kg in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 1,445 kg.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.1 times China, Hong Kong SAR's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 132nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 129th of 172 countries.

China, Hong Kong SAR has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 58,793 kg 2,498 kg 56,295 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
1970s 89,042 kg 1,907 kg 87,135 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
1980s 87,911 kg 1,284 kg 86,627 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
1990s 33,132 kg 1,211 kg 31,921 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 37,287 kg 6,475 kg 30,812 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s 27,139 kg 18,890 kg 8,249 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 23,182 kg 23,161 kg 20.47 kg China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, breeding — manure applied to soils, China, Hong Kong SAR or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 24,627 kg against 23,182 kg in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, breeding — manure applied to soils between China, Hong Kong SAR and Sao Tome and Principe?
1,445 kg, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Sao Tome and Principe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for swine, breeding — manure applied to soils?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 132nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 129th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Sao Tome and Principe: Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/china-hong-kong-sar/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/china-hong-kong-sar/sao-tome-and-principe/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Sao Tome and Principe: Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).