Cook Islands vs Eswatini: Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils

Cook Islands
40,165 kg
in 2023
Eswatini
26,076 kg
in 2023
Cook Islands rank
124th
Eswatini rank
127th

Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Cook Islands
  • Eswatini
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196119922023

How they compare

Cook Islands currently reports 40,165 kg against 26,076 kg in Eswatini, a difference of 14,089 kg.

That makes Cook Islands's figure about 1.5 times Eswatini's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Cook Islands has been ahead every year.

Cook Islands ranks 124th and Eswatini ranks 127th of 172 countries.

Cook Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cook Islands Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 17,306 kg 5,557 kg 11,749 kg Cook Islands
1970s 20,457 kg 9,119 kg 11,338 kg Cook Islands
1980s 28,880 kg 9,847 kg 19,033 kg Cook Islands
1990s 52,201 kg 16,633 kg 35,568 kg Cook Islands
2000s 54,876 kg 19,115 kg 35,761 kg Cook Islands
2010s 53,981 kg 21,311 kg 32,670 kg Cook Islands
2020s 42,785 kg 26,630 kg 16,156 kg Cook Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, breeding — manure applied to soils, Cook Islands or Eswatini?
Cook Islands, at 40,165 kg against 26,076 kg in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, breeding — manure applied to soils between Cook Islands and Eswatini?
14,089 kg, with Cook Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cook Islands and Eswatini?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cook Islands and Eswatini rank globally for swine, breeding — manure applied to soils?
Cook Islands ranks 124th and Eswatini ranks 127th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cook Islands vs Eswatini: Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/cook-islands/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/cook-islands/eswatini/">Cook Islands vs Eswatini: Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).