Czechoslovakia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils

Czechoslovakia
15.31 million kg
in 1992
United Republic of Tanzania
299,262 kg
in 2023
Czechoslovakia rank
16th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
14th

Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Czechoslovakia
  • United Republic of Tanzania
05.0M10.0M15.0M196119922023

How they compare

Czechoslovakia currently reports 15.31 million kg against 299,262 kg in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 15.01 million kg.

That makes Czechoslovakia's figure about 51.2 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Czechoslovakia has been ahead every year.

Czechoslovakia ranks 16th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 14th of 172 countries.

Czechoslovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechoslovakia United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 12.41 million kg 57,447 kg 12.35 million kg Czechoslovakia
1970s 13.96 million kg 76,020 kg 13.89 million kg Czechoslovakia
1980s 15.63 million kg 130,303 kg 15.49 million kg Czechoslovakia
1990s 15.68 million kg 183,143 kg 15.50 million kg Czechoslovakia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, breeding — manure applied to soils, Czechoslovakia or United Republic of Tanzania?
Czechoslovakia, at 15.31 million kg against 299,262 kg in United Republic of Tanzania as of 1992.
What is the difference in swine, breeding — manure applied to soils between Czechoslovakia and United Republic of Tanzania?
15.01 million kg, with Czechoslovakia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechoslovakia and United Republic of Tanzania?
32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
How do Czechoslovakia and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for swine, breeding — manure applied to soils?
Czechoslovakia ranks 16th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 14th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Czechoslovakia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/czechoslovakia/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/czechoslovakia/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Czechoslovakia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).