Ethiopia vs Puerto Rico: Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils

Ethiopia
20,732 kg
in 2023
Puerto Rico
23,578 kg
in 2023
Ethiopia rank
133rd
Puerto Rico rank
131st

Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Ethiopia
  • Puerto Rico
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k196119922023

How they compare

Puerto Rico currently reports 23,578 kg against 20,732 kg in Ethiopia, a difference of 2,846 kg.

That makes Puerto Rico's figure about 1.1 times Ethiopia's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Puerto Rico has been ahead every year.

Ethiopia ranks 133rd and Puerto Rico ranks 131st of 172 countries.

Puerto Rico has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ethiopia Puerto Rico Difference Ahead
1990s 12,414 kg 97,840 kg 85,426 kg Puerto Rico
2000s 15,642 kg 39,426 kg 23,784 kg Puerto Rico
2010s 18,923 kg 25,827 kg 6,904 kg Puerto Rico
2020s 20,258 kg 23,578 kg 3,320 kg Puerto Rico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, breeding — manure applied to soils, Ethiopia or Puerto Rico?
Puerto Rico, at 23,578 kg against 20,732 kg in Ethiopia as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, breeding — manure applied to soils between Ethiopia and Puerto Rico?
2,846 kg, with Puerto Rico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Puerto Rico?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Ethiopia and Puerto Rico rank globally for swine, breeding — manure applied to soils?
Ethiopia ranks 133rd and Puerto Rico ranks 131st of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ethiopia vs Puerto Rico: Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/ethiopia/puerto-rico-us/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/ethiopia/puerto-rico-us/">Ethiopia vs Puerto Rico: Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).