Micronesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils

Micronesia
98,754 kg
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
299,262 kg
in 2023
Micronesia rank
15th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
14th

Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Micronesia
  • United Republic of Tanzania
0100.0k200.0k300.0k196119922023

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 299,262 kg against 98,754 kg in Micronesia, a difference of 200,508 kg.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 3.0 times Micronesia's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, United Republic of Tanzania has been ahead every year.

Micronesia ranks 15th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 14th of 20 countries.

United Republic of Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Micronesia United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 19,215 kg 57,447 kg 38,232 kg United Republic of Tanzania
1970s 19,905 kg 76,020 kg 56,115 kg United Republic of Tanzania
1980s 20,645 kg 130,303 kg 109,658 kg United Republic of Tanzania
1990s 70,124 kg 202,748 kg 132,623 kg United Republic of Tanzania
2000s 81,152 kg 261,708 kg 180,556 kg United Republic of Tanzania
2010s 91,186 kg 285,012 kg 193,826 kg United Republic of Tanzania
2020s 97,577 kg 297,533 kg 199,956 kg United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, breeding — manure applied to soils, Micronesia or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 299,262 kg against 98,754 kg in Micronesia as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, breeding — manure applied to soils between Micronesia and United Republic of Tanzania?
200,508 kg, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Micronesia and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for swine, breeding — manure applied to soils?
Micronesia ranks 15th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 14th of 20 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Micronesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/micronesia/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/micronesia/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Micronesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).