Cook Islands vs Eswatini: Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils that leaches

Cook Islands
12,050 kg
in 2023
Eswatini
7,823 kg
in 2023
Cook Islands rank
124th
Eswatini rank
127th

Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils that leaches over time

  • Cook Islands
  • Eswatini
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k196119922023

How they compare

Cook Islands currently reports 12,050 kg against 7,823 kg in Eswatini, a difference of 4,227 kg.

That makes Cook Islands's figure about 1.5 times Eswatini's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Cook Islands has been ahead every year.

Cook Islands ranks 124th and Eswatini ranks 127th of 172 countries.

Cook Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cook Islands Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 5,192 kg 1,667 kg 3,525 kg Cook Islands
1970s 6,137 kg 2,736 kg 3,401 kg Cook Islands
1980s 8,664 kg 2,954 kg 5,710 kg Cook Islands
1990s 15,660 kg 4,990 kg 10,671 kg Cook Islands
2000s 16,463 kg 5,735 kg 10,728 kg Cook Islands
2010s 16,194 kg 6,393 kg 9,801 kg Cook Islands
2020s 12,836 kg 7,989 kg 4,847 kg Cook Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, breeding — manure applied to soils that leaches, Cook Islands or Eswatini?
Cook Islands, at 12,050 kg against 7,823 kg in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, breeding — manure applied to soils that leaches between Cook Islands and Eswatini?
4,227 kg, with Cook Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cook Islands and Eswatini?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cook Islands and Eswatini rank globally for swine, breeding — manure applied to soils that leaches?
Cook Islands ranks 124th and Eswatini ranks 127th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cook Islands vs Eswatini: Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils that leaches. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-manure-applied-to-soils-that-leaches-n-content/cook-islands/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-manure-applied-to-soils-that-leaches-n-content/cook-islands/eswatini/">Cook Islands vs Eswatini: Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils that leaches</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).