Micronesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils that leaches

Micronesia
29,626 kg
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
89,779 kg
in 2023
Micronesia rank
15th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
14th

Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils that leaches over time

  • Micronesia
  • United Republic of Tanzania
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196119922023

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 89,779 kg against 29,626 kg in Micronesia, a difference of 60,153 kg.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 3.0 times Micronesia's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, United Republic of Tanzania has been ahead every year.

Micronesia ranks 15th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 14th of 20 countries.

United Republic of Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Micronesia United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 5,765 kg 17,234 kg 11,470 kg United Republic of Tanzania
1970s 5,972 kg 22,806 kg 16,835 kg United Republic of Tanzania
1980s 6,193 kg 39,091 kg 32,898 kg United Republic of Tanzania
1990s 21,037 kg 60,824 kg 39,787 kg United Republic of Tanzania
2000s 24,346 kg 78,512 kg 54,167 kg United Republic of Tanzania
2010s 27,356 kg 85,504 kg 58,148 kg United Republic of Tanzania
2020s 29,273 kg 89,260 kg 59,987 kg United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, breeding — manure applied to soils that leaches, Micronesia or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 89,779 kg against 29,626 kg in Micronesia as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, breeding — manure applied to soils that leaches between Micronesia and United Republic of Tanzania?
60,153 kg, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Micronesia and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for swine, breeding — manure applied to soils that leaches?
Micronesia ranks 15th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 14th of 20 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Micronesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils that leaches. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-manure-applied-to-soils-that-leaches-n-content/micronesia/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-manure-applied-to-soils-that-leaches-n-content/micronesia/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Micronesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils that leaches</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).