Australia and New Zealand vs Malawi: Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils that volatilises

Australia and New Zealand
935,884 kg
in 2023
Malawi
1.01 million kg
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
31st
Malawi rank
29th

Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils that volatilises over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Malawi
0500.0k1.0M1.5M196119922023

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 1.01 million kg against 935,884 kg in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 76,736 kg.

That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times Australia and New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 31st and Malawi ranks 29th of 172 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Malawi Difference Ahead
1960s 830,602 kg 14,779 kg 815,823 kg Australia and New Zealand
1970s 1.03 million kg 19,258 kg 1.01 million kg Australia and New Zealand
1980s 1.02 million kg 25,429 kg 994,239 kg Australia and New Zealand
1990s 1.05 million kg 36,220 kg 1.01 million kg Australia and New Zealand
2000s 1.02 million kg 79,571 kg 936,707 kg Australia and New Zealand
2010s 891,994 kg 414,857 kg 477,138 kg Australia and New Zealand
2020s 934,982 kg 910,884 kg 24,098 kg Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, breeding — manure applied to soils that volatilises, Australia and New Zealand or Malawi?
Malawi, at 1.01 million kg against 935,884 kg in Australia and New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, breeding — manure applied to soils that volatilises between Australia and New Zealand and Malawi?
76,736 kg, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Malawi?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Malawi rank globally for swine, breeding — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 31st and Malawi ranks 29th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Malawi: Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/australia-and-new-zealand/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/australia-and-new-zealand/malawi/">Australia and New Zealand vs Malawi: Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).