Botswana vs Nauru: Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils that volatilises

Botswana
953.09 kg
in 2023
Nauru
1,042 kg
in 2023
Botswana rank
153rd
Nauru rank
151st

Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils that volatilises over time

  • Botswana
  • Nauru
05001.0k1.5k2.0k196119922023

How they compare

Nauru currently reports 1,042 kg against 953.09 kg in Botswana, a difference of 88.91 kg.

That makes Nauru's figure about 1.1 times Botswana's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 153rd and Nauru ranks 151st of 172 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 4 and Nauru in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Nauru Difference Ahead
1960s 812.56 kg 394.74 kg 417.82 kg Botswana
1970s 1,491 kg 540.21 kg 950.3 kg Botswana
1980s 986.17 kg 739.78 kg 246.39 kg Botswana
1990s 663.8 kg 942.79 kg 278.99 kg Nauru
2000s 1,023 kg 980.64 kg 42.55 kg Botswana
2010s 355.58 kg 1,033 kg 677.05 kg Nauru
2020s 729.9 kg 1,041 kg 311.04 kg Nauru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, breeding — manure applied to soils that volatilises, Botswana or Nauru?
Nauru, at 1,042 kg against 953.09 kg in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, breeding — manure applied to soils that volatilises between Botswana and Nauru?
88.91 kg, with Nauru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Nauru?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Nauru rank globally for swine, breeding — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
Botswana ranks 153rd and Nauru ranks 151st of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Nauru: Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/botswana/naoero/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/botswana/naoero/">Botswana vs Nauru: Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).