China, Hong Kong SAR vs Puerto Rico: Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils that volatilises

China, Hong Kong SAR
4,636 kg
in 2023
Puerto Rico
4,716 kg
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
132nd
Puerto Rico rank
131st

Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils that volatilises over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Puerto Rico
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k196119922023

How they compare

Puerto Rico currently reports 4,716 kg against 4,636 kg in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 80 kg.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Puerto Rico ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 132nd and Puerto Rico ranks 131st of 172 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 1 and Puerto Rico in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Puerto Rico Difference Ahead
1960s 11,759 kg 19,428 kg 7,669 kg Puerto Rico
1970s 17,808 kg 27,271 kg 9,463 kg Puerto Rico
1980s 17,582 kg 23,551 kg 5,969 kg Puerto Rico
1990s 6,626 kg 20,615 kg 13,988 kg Puerto Rico
2000s 7,457 kg 7,885 kg 427.71 kg Puerto Rico
2010s 5,428 kg 5,165 kg 262.47 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 4,636 kg 4,716 kg 79.19 kg Puerto Rico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, breeding — manure applied to soils that volatilises, China, Hong Kong SAR or Puerto Rico?
Puerto Rico, at 4,716 kg against 4,636 kg in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, breeding — manure applied to soils that volatilises between China, Hong Kong SAR and Puerto Rico?
80 kg, with Puerto Rico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Puerto Rico?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Puerto Rico rank globally for swine, breeding — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 132nd and Puerto Rico ranks 131st of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Puerto Rico: Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/china-hong-kong-sar/puerto-rico-us/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/china-hong-kong-sar/puerto-rico-us/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Puerto Rico: Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, breeding — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).