Peru vs Uganda: Swine, breeding — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per

Peru
0.0576 kg per person
in 2023
Uganda
0.0554 kg per person
in 2023
Peru rank
67th
Uganda rank
68th

Swine, breeding — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per over time

  • Peru
  • Uganda
00.020.040.060.080.1196119922023

How they compare

Peru currently reports 0.0576 kg per person against 0.0554 kg per person in Uganda, a difference of 0.0022 kg per person.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Peru ahead.

Peru ranks 67th and Uganda ranks 68th of 149 countries.

Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Peru Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0845 kg per person 0.0017 kg per person 0.0828 kg per person Peru
1970s 0.0775 kg per person 0.0053 kg per person 0.0723 kg per person Peru
1980s 0.0657 kg per person 0.0115 kg per person 0.0542 kg per person Peru
1990s 0.0577 kg per person 0.0368 kg per person 0.0209 kg per person Peru
2000s 0.0608 kg per person 0.0391 kg per person 0.0218 kg per person Peru
2010s 0.0601 kg per person 0.0487 kg per person 0.0114 kg per person Peru
2020s 0.057 kg per person 0.0564 kg per person 0.0007 kg per person Peru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, breeding — manure management (manure treated, n content), per, Peru or Uganda?
Peru, at 0.0576 kg per person against 0.0554 kg per person in Uganda as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, breeding — manure management (manure treated, n content), per between Peru and Uganda?
0.0022 kg per person, with Peru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Uganda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Peru and Uganda rank globally for swine, breeding — manure management (manure treated, n content), per?
Peru ranks 67th and Uganda ranks 68th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Swine, breeding — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Peru vs Uganda: Swine, breeding — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content-per-capita/peru/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content-per-capita/peru/uganda/">Peru vs Uganda: Swine, breeding — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, breeding — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per capita
Unit
kg per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Swine, breeding — Manure management (manure treated, N content) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.