Australia and New Zealand vs Serbia and Montenegro: Swine, breeding — Manure management

Australia and New Zealand
8.22 million kg
in 2023
Serbia and Montenegro
9.64 million kg
in 2005
Australia and New Zealand rank
24th
Serbia and Montenegro rank
22nd

Swine, breeding — Manure management over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Serbia and Montenegro
05.0M10.0M15.0M196119922023

How they compare

Serbia and Montenegro currently reports 9.64 million kg against 8.22 million kg in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 1.42 million kg.

That makes Serbia and Montenegro's figure about 1.2 times Australia and New Zealand's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Serbia and Montenegro has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 24th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 22nd of 172 countries.

Serbia and Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Serbia and Montenegro Difference Ahead
1990s 9.28 million kg 12.52 million kg 3.25 million kg Serbia and Montenegro
2000s 9.12 million kg 10.94 million kg 1.82 million kg Serbia and Montenegro

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, breeding — manure management, Australia and New Zealand or Serbia and Montenegro?
Serbia and Montenegro, at 9.64 million kg against 8.22 million kg in Australia and New Zealand as of 2005.
What is the difference in swine, breeding — manure management between Australia and New Zealand and Serbia and Montenegro?
1.42 million kg, with Serbia and Montenegro ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Serbia and Montenegro?
14 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2005.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Serbia and Montenegro rank globally for swine, breeding — manure management?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 24th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 22nd of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine, breeding — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Serbia and Montenegro: Swine, breeding — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/australia-and-new-zealand/serbia-and-montenegro/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/australia-and-new-zealand/serbia-and-montenegro/">Australia and New Zealand vs Serbia and Montenegro: Swine, breeding — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, breeding — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).