Belgium-Luxembourg vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Swine, breeding — Manure management

Belgium-Luxembourg
23.17 million kg
in 1999
Democratic Republic of the Congo
568,829 kg
in 2023
Belgium-Luxembourg rank
15th
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
13th

Swine, breeding — Manure management over time

  • Belgium-Luxembourg
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
05.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M25.0M196119922023

How they compare

Belgium-Luxembourg currently reports 23.17 million kg against 568,829 kg in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 22.60 million kg.

That makes Belgium-Luxembourg's figure about 40.7 times Democratic Republic of the Congo's.

Across all 39 years both countries report, Belgium-Luxembourg has been ahead every year.

Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 15th and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 13th of 172 countries.

Belgium-Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium-Luxembourg Democratic Republic of the Congo Difference Ahead
1960s 6.25 million kg 286,115 kg 5.96 million kg Belgium-Luxembourg
1970s 13.65 million kg 371,587 kg 13.27 million kg Belgium-Luxembourg
1980s 16.60 million kg 436,502 kg 16.16 million kg Belgium-Luxembourg
1990s 21.26 million kg 624,639 kg 20.64 million kg Belgium-Luxembourg

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, breeding — manure management, Belgium-Luxembourg or Democratic Republic of the Congo?
Belgium-Luxembourg, at 23.17 million kg against 568,829 kg in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 1999.
What is the difference in swine, breeding — manure management between Belgium-Luxembourg and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
22.60 million kg, with Belgium-Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium-Luxembourg and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
39 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1999.
How do Belgium-Luxembourg and Democratic Republic of the Congo rank globally for swine, breeding — manure management?
Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 15th and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 13th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine, breeding — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium-Luxembourg vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Swine, breeding — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/belgium-luxembourg/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/belgium-luxembourg/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/">Belgium-Luxembourg vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Swine, breeding — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, breeding — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).