Belgium-Luxembourg vs United Republic of Tanzania: Swine, breeding — Manure management

Belgium-Luxembourg
23.17 million kg
in 1999
United Republic of Tanzania
300,040 kg
in 2023
Belgium-Luxembourg rank
15th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
14th

Swine, breeding — Manure management over time

  • Belgium-Luxembourg
  • United Republic of Tanzania
05.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M25.0M196119922023

How they compare

Belgium-Luxembourg currently reports 23.17 million kg against 300,040 kg in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 22.87 million kg.

That makes Belgium-Luxembourg's figure about 77.2 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 39 years both countries report, Belgium-Luxembourg has been ahead every year.

Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 15th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 14th of 172 countries.

Belgium-Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium-Luxembourg United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 6.25 million kg 57,597 kg 6.19 million kg Belgium-Luxembourg
1970s 13.65 million kg 76,218 kg 13.57 million kg Belgium-Luxembourg
1980s 16.60 million kg 130,642 kg 16.47 million kg Belgium-Luxembourg
1990s 21.26 million kg 203,274 kg 21.06 million kg Belgium-Luxembourg

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, breeding — manure management, Belgium-Luxembourg or United Republic of Tanzania?
Belgium-Luxembourg, at 23.17 million kg against 300,040 kg in United Republic of Tanzania as of 1999.
What is the difference in swine, breeding — manure management between Belgium-Luxembourg and United Republic of Tanzania?
22.87 million kg, with Belgium-Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium-Luxembourg and United Republic of Tanzania?
39 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1999.
How do Belgium-Luxembourg and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for swine, breeding — manure management?
Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 15th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 14th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine, breeding — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium-Luxembourg vs United Republic of Tanzania: Swine, breeding — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/belgium-luxembourg/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/belgium-luxembourg/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Belgium-Luxembourg vs United Republic of Tanzania: Swine, breeding — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, breeding — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).