Botswana vs Equatorial Guinea: Swine, breeding β€” Manure management

Botswana
4,778 kg
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea
4,210 kg
in 2023
Botswana rank
168th
Equatorial Guinea rank
171st

Swine, breeding β€” Manure management over time

  • Botswana
  • Equatorial Guinea
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k196119922023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 4,778 kg against 4,210 kg in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 568 kg.

That makes Botswana's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 168th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 171st of 188 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 5 and Equatorial Guinea in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 4,073 kg 2,014 kg 2,059 kg Botswana
1970s 7,472 kg 2,389 kg 5,083 kg Botswana
1980s 4,944 kg 2,603 kg 2,341 kg Botswana
1990s 3,328 kg 3,063 kg 264.19 kg Botswana
2000s 5,129 kg 3,474 kg 1,655 kg Botswana
2010s 1,783 kg 3,840 kg 2,058 kg Equatorial Guinea
2020s 3,659 kg 4,152 kg 493.1 kg Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, breeding β€” manure management, Botswana or Equatorial Guinea?
Botswana, at 4,778 kg against 4,210 kg in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, breeding β€” manure management between Botswana and Equatorial Guinea?
568 kg, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Equatorial Guinea?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for swine, breeding β€” manure management?
Botswana ranks 168th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 171st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine, breeding β€” Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Equatorial Guinea: Swine, breeding β€” Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/botswana/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/botswana/equatorial-guinea/">Botswana vs Equatorial Guinea: Swine, breeding β€” Manure management</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, breeding β€” Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).