China, Taiwan Province of vs Madagascar: Swine, breeding — Manure management

China, Taiwan Province of
1.26 million kg
in 2023
Madagascar
1.31 million kg
in 2023
China, Taiwan Province of rank
59th
Madagascar rank
58th

Swine, breeding — Manure management over time

  • China, Taiwan Province of
  • Madagascar
500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M2.5M196119922023

How they compare

Madagascar currently reports 1.31 million kg against 1.26 million kg in China, Taiwan Province of, a difference of 43,070 kg.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China, Taiwan Province of ahead.

China, Taiwan Province of ranks 59th and Madagascar ranks 58th of 172 countries.

China, Taiwan Province of has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Taiwan Province of Madagascar Difference Ahead
1960s 726,136 kg 292,882 kg 433,255 kg China, Taiwan Province of
1970s 843,259 kg 372,323 kg 470,936 kg China, Taiwan Province of
1980s 1.48 million kg 761,027 kg 723,364 kg China, Taiwan Province of
1990s 2.25 million kg 819,633 kg 1.43 million kg China, Taiwan Province of
2000s 1.71 million kg 527,745 kg 1.18 million kg China, Taiwan Province of
2010s 1.42 million kg 899,957 kg 518,325 kg China, Taiwan Province of
2020s 1.32 million kg 1.21 million kg 106,652 kg China, Taiwan Province of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, breeding — manure management, China, Taiwan Province of or Madagascar?
Madagascar, at 1.31 million kg against 1.26 million kg in China, Taiwan Province of as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, breeding — manure management between China, Taiwan Province of and Madagascar?
43,070 kg, with Madagascar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Taiwan Province of and Madagascar?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China, Taiwan Province of and Madagascar rank globally for swine, breeding — manure management?
China, Taiwan Province of ranks 59th and Madagascar ranks 58th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine, breeding — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Taiwan Province of vs Madagascar: Swine, breeding — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/china-taiwan-province-of/madagascar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/china-taiwan-province-of/madagascar/">China, Taiwan Province of vs Madagascar: Swine, breeding — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, breeding — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).