China vs OECD: Swine, breeding — Manure management

China
107.80 million kg
in 2023
OECD
588.11 million kg
in 2023
China rank
3rd
OECD rank
1st

Swine, breeding — Manure management over time

  • China
  • OECD
0200.0M400.0M600.0M196119922023

How they compare

OECD currently reports 588.11 million kg against 107.80 million kg in China, a difference of 480.31 million kg.

That makes OECD's figure about 5.5 times China's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, OECD has been ahead every year.

China ranks 3rd and OECD ranks 1st of 188 countries.

OECD has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China OECD Difference Ahead
1960s 35.44 million kg 421.97 million kg 386.54 million kg OECD
1970s 64.06 million kg 521.51 million kg 457.45 million kg OECD
1980s 79.02 million kg 586.42 million kg 507.39 million kg OECD
1990s 97.88 million kg 605.07 million kg 507.19 million kg OECD
2000s 106.82 million kg 616.60 million kg 509.79 million kg OECD
2010s 111.49 million kg 603.83 million kg 492.34 million kg OECD
2020s 108.20 million kg 605.78 million kg 497.58 million kg OECD

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, breeding — manure management, China or OECD?
OECD, at 588.11 million kg against 107.80 million kg in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, breeding — manure management between China and OECD?
480.31 million kg, with OECD ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and OECD?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China and OECD rank globally for swine, breeding — manure management?
China ranks 3rd and OECD ranks 1st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine, breeding — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs OECD: Swine, breeding — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/china/oecd/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/china/oecd/">China vs OECD: Swine, breeding — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, breeding — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).