Equatorial Guinea vs Tunisia: Swine, breeding β€” Manure management

Equatorial Guinea
4,210 kg
in 2023
Tunisia
3,036 kg
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
155th
Tunisia rank
158th

Swine, breeding β€” Manure management over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Tunisia
1.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k196119922023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 4,210 kg against 3,036 kg in Tunisia, a difference of 1,174 kg.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.4 times Tunisia's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tunisia ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 155th and Tunisia ranks 158th of 169 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 5 and Tunisia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 2,014 kg 2,267 kg 252.94 kg Tunisia
1970s 2,389 kg 1,743 kg 646.42 kg Equatorial Guinea
1980s 2,603 kg 2,004 kg 598.07 kg Equatorial Guinea
1990s 3,063 kg 3,406 kg 342.32 kg Tunisia
2000s 3,474 kg 3,373 kg 101.18 kg Equatorial Guinea
2010s 3,840 kg 3,109 kg 731.07 kg Equatorial Guinea
2020s 4,152 kg 3,054 kg 1,098 kg Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, breeding β€” manure management, Equatorial Guinea or Tunisia?
Equatorial Guinea, at 4,210 kg against 3,036 kg in Tunisia as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, breeding β€” manure management between Equatorial Guinea and Tunisia?
1,174 kg, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Tunisia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Tunisia rank globally for swine, breeding β€” manure management?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 155th and Tunisia ranks 158th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine, breeding β€” Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Tunisia: Swine, breeding β€” Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/equatorial-guinea/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/equatorial-guinea/tunisia/">Equatorial Guinea vs Tunisia: Swine, breeding β€” Manure management</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, breeding β€” Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).