Panama vs Zimbabwe: Swine, breeding — Manure management

Panama
236,115 kg
in 2023
Zimbabwe
203,989 kg
in 2023
Panama rank
96th
Zimbabwe rank
97th

Swine, breeding — Manure management over time

  • Panama
  • Zimbabwe
50.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k196119922023

How they compare

Panama currently reports 236,115 kg against 203,989 kg in Zimbabwe, a difference of 32,126 kg.

That makes Panama's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Panama ahead.

Panama ranks 96th and Zimbabwe ranks 97th of 169 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Panama averaged higher in 5 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Panama Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 106,779 kg 79,054 kg 27,725 kg Panama
1970s 101,688 kg 110,003 kg 8,315 kg Zimbabwe
1980s 119,424 kg 112,813 kg 6,611 kg Panama
1990s 144,643 kg 150,377 kg 5,734 kg Zimbabwe
2000s 167,297 kg 139,232 kg 28,065 kg Panama
2010s 195,994 kg 171,340 kg 24,654 kg Panama
2020s 225,834 kg 178,924 kg 46,911 kg Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, breeding — manure management, Panama or Zimbabwe?
Panama, at 236,115 kg against 203,989 kg in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, breeding — manure management between Panama and Zimbabwe?
32,126 kg, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Panama and Zimbabwe rank globally for swine, breeding — manure management?
Panama ranks 96th and Zimbabwe ranks 97th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine, breeding — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Panama vs Zimbabwe: Swine, breeding — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/panama/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/panama/zimbabwe/">Panama vs Zimbabwe: Swine, breeding — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, breeding — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).