China, Hong Kong SAR vs Israel: Swine, breeding — Stocks

China, Hong Kong SAR
11,670 An
in 2023
Israel
13,300 An
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
107th
Israel rank
106th

Swine, breeding — Stocks over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Israel
020.0k40.0k60.0k196119922023

How they compare

Israel currently reports 13,300 An against 11,670 An in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 1,630 An.

That makes Israel's figure about 1.1 times China, Hong Kong SAR's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 107th and Israel ranks 106th of 172 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 4 and Israel in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Israel Difference Ahead
1960s 29,596 An 5,043 An 24,553 An China, Hong Kong SAR
1970s 44,823 An 10,340 An 34,483 An China, Hong Kong SAR
1980s 44,254 An 11,840 An 32,414 An China, Hong Kong SAR
1990s 16,678 An 13,512 An 3,166 An China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 18,770 An 18,960 An 190 An Israel
2010s 13,662 An 19,450 An 5,788 An Israel
2020s 11,670 An 15,499 An 3,830 An Israel

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, breeding — stocks, China, Hong Kong SAR or Israel?
Israel, at 13,300 An against 11,670 An in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, breeding — stocks between China, Hong Kong SAR and Israel?
1,630 An, with Israel ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Israel?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Israel rank globally for swine, breeding — stocks?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 107th and Israel ranks 106th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine, breeding — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Israel: Swine, breeding — Stocks. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-stocks/china-hong-kong-sar/israel/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-stocks/china-hong-kong-sar/israel/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Israel: Swine, breeding — Stocks</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, breeding — Stocks
Unit
An
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).