Ecuador vs Non-Annex I countries: Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate

Ecuador
4.32 % change on previous year
in 2023
Non-Annex I countries
-2.32 % change on previous year
in 2023
Ecuador rank
31st
Non-Annex I countries rank
28th

Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate over time

  • Ecuador
  • Non-Annex I countries
-40-200204060196219922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 4.32 % change on previous year against -2.32 % change on previous year in Non-Annex I countries, a difference of 6.64 % change on previous year.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.9 times Non-Annex I countries's.

The two have swapped places 26 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 31st and Non-Annex I countries ranks 28th of 191 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Non-Annex I countries in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Non-Annex I countries Difference Ahead
1960s 4.16 % change on previous year 5.46 % change on previous year 1.3 % change on previous year Non-Annex I countries
1970s 6.22 % change on previous year 4.11 % change on previous year 2.1 % change on previous year Ecuador
1980s -3.28 % change on previous year 1.1 % change on previous year 4.38 % change on previous year Non-Annex I countries
1990s 0.4564 % change on previous year 1.6 % change on previous year 1.14 % change on previous year Non-Annex I countries
2000s -1.51 % change on previous year 1.31 % change on previous year 2.82 % change on previous year Non-Annex I countries
2010s 1.28 % change on previous year -1.69 % change on previous year 2.96 % change on previous year Ecuador
2020s -3.9 % change on previous year 5.02 % change on previous year 8.92 % change on previous year Non-Annex I countries

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth rate, Ecuador or Non-Annex I countries?
Ecuador, at 4.32 % change on previous year against -2.32 % change on previous year in Non-Annex I countries as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth rate between Ecuador and Non-Annex I countries?
6.64 % change on previous year, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Non-Annex I countries?
62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Non-Annex I countries rank globally for swine — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth rate?
Ecuador ranks 31st and Non-Annex I countries ranks 28th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Non-Annex I countries: Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-annual-growth-rate/ecuador/non-annex-i-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-annual-growth-rate/ecuador/non-annex-i-countries/">Ecuador vs Non-Annex I countries: Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
225 places, 12,687 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.