Antigua and Barbuda vs Ecuador: Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita

Antigua and Barbuda
0.0721 kg per person
in 2023
Ecuador
0.0719 kg per person
in 2023
Antigua and Barbuda rank
86th
Ecuador rank
88th

Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Ecuador
00.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 0.0721 kg per person against 0.0719 kg per person in Ecuador, a difference of 0.0002 kg per person.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 86th and Ecuador ranks 88th of 149 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Ecuador Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0597 kg per person 0.3924 kg per person 0.3327 kg per person Ecuador
1970s 0.0555 kg per person 0.4675 kg per person 0.412 kg per person Ecuador
1980s 0.0476 kg per person 0.407 kg per person 0.3594 kg per person Ecuador
1990s 0.0562 kg per person 0.2836 kg per person 0.2274 kg per person Ecuador
2000s 0.0456 kg per person 0.135 kg per person 0.0893 kg per person Ecuador
2010s 0.0739 kg per person 0.114 kg per person 0.0401 kg per person Ecuador
2020s 0.072 kg per person 0.0747 kg per person 0.0027 kg per person Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — losses from manure treated (n content), per capita, Antigua and Barbuda or Ecuador?
Antigua and Barbuda, at 0.0721 kg per person against 0.0719 kg per person in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine — losses from manure treated (n content), per capita between Antigua and Barbuda and Ecuador?
0.0002 kg per person, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Ecuador?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Ecuador rank globally for swine — losses from manure treated (n content), per capita?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 86th and Ecuador ranks 88th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Ecuador: Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-capita/antigua-and-barbuda/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-capita/antigua-and-barbuda/ecuador/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Ecuador: Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita
Unit
kg per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.