Cuba vs New Zealand: Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita

Cuba
0.2072 kg per person
in 2023
New Zealand
0.2275 kg per person
in 2023
Cuba rank
55th
New Zealand rank
53rd

Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita over time

  • Cuba
  • New Zealand
00.511.5196119922023

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 0.2275 kg per person against 0.2072 kg per person in Cuba, a difference of 0.0203 kg per person.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Zealand ahead.

Cuba ranks 55th and New Zealand ranks 53rd of 149 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba New Zealand Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2444 kg per person 1.22 kg per person 0.9732 kg per person New Zealand
1970s 0.2036 kg per person 0.7587 kg per person 0.555 kg per person New Zealand
1980s 0.217 kg per person 0.6251 kg per person 0.4081 kg per person New Zealand
1990s 0.2169 kg per person 0.5236 kg per person 0.3067 kg per person New Zealand
2000s 0.195 kg per person 0.411 kg per person 0.216 kg per person New Zealand
2010s 0.2167 kg per person 0.2995 kg per person 0.0829 kg per person New Zealand
2020s 0.1597 kg per person 0.2337 kg per person 0.074 kg per person New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — losses from manure treated (n content), per capita, Cuba or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 0.2275 kg per person against 0.2072 kg per person in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine — losses from manure treated (n content), per capita between Cuba and New Zealand?
0.0203 kg per person, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and New Zealand?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cuba and New Zealand rank globally for swine — losses from manure treated (n content), per capita?
Cuba ranks 55th and New Zealand ranks 53rd of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs New Zealand: Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-capita/cuba/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-capita/cuba/new-zealand/">Cuba vs New Zealand: Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita
Unit
kg per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.