Antigua and Barbuda vs El Salvador: Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre

Antigua and Barbuda
15.3 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador
15.64 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Antigua and Barbuda rank
62nd
El Salvador rank
60th

Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • El Salvador
010203040196119922023

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 15.64 kg per square kilometre against 15.3 kg per square kilometre in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 0.34 kg per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was El Salvador ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 62nd and El Salvador ranks 60th of 149 countries.

El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda El Salvador Difference Ahead
1960s 8.17 kg per square kilometre 25.22 kg per square kilometre 17.04 kg per square kilometre El Salvador
1970s 8.12 kg per square kilometre 29.48 kg per square kilometre 21.36 kg per square kilometre El Salvador
1980s 6.95 kg per square kilometre 24.55 kg per square kilometre 17.59 kg per square kilometre El Salvador
1990s 8.74 kg per square kilometre 15.78 kg per square kilometre 7.03 kg per square kilometre El Salvador
2000s 8.24 kg per square kilometre 23.41 kg per square kilometre 15.18 kg per square kilometre El Salvador
2010s 14.9 kg per square kilometre 18.06 kg per square kilometre 3.16 kg per square kilometre El Salvador
2020s 15.15 kg per square kilometre 15.64 kg per square kilometre 0.4874 kg per square kilometre El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre, Antigua and Barbuda or El Salvador?
El Salvador, at 15.64 kg per square kilometre against 15.3 kg per square kilometre in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre between Antigua and Barbuda and El Salvador?
0.34 kg per square kilometre, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and El Salvador?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and El Salvador rank globally for swine — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 62nd and El Salvador ranks 60th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs El Salvador: Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/el-salvador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/el-salvador/">Antigua and Barbuda vs El Salvador: Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.