Australia vs Zambia: Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre

Australia
1.52 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
1.48 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
112th
Zambia rank
113th

Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre over time

  • Australia
  • Zambia
00.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 1.52 kg per square kilometre against 1.48 kg per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 0.04 kg per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 112th and Zambia ranks 113th of 149 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 1.07 kg per square kilometre 0.0999 kg per square kilometre 0.975 kg per square kilometre Australia
1970s 1.55 kg per square kilometre 0.1994 kg per square kilometre 1.35 kg per square kilometre Australia
1980s 1.57 kg per square kilometre 0.2622 kg per square kilometre 1.3 kg per square kilometre Australia
1990s 1.63 kg per square kilometre 0.3799 kg per square kilometre 1.25 kg per square kilometre Australia
2000s 1.6 kg per square kilometre 0.5098 kg per square kilometre 1.09 kg per square kilometre Australia
2010s 1.42 kg per square kilometre 1.36 kg per square kilometre 0.0558 kg per square kilometre Australia
2020s 1.52 kg per square kilometre 1.45 kg per square kilometre 0.0645 kg per square kilometre Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre, Australia or Zambia?
Australia, at 1.52 kg per square kilometre against 1.48 kg per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre between Australia and Zambia?
0.04 kg per square kilometre, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Zambia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Zambia rank globally for swine — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre?
Australia ranks 112th and Zambia ranks 113th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Zambia: Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/australia/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/australia/zambia/">Australia vs Zambia: Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.