Central African Republic vs Eswatini: Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre

Central African Republic
1.56 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini
2.49 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Central African Republic rank
111th
Eswatini rank
108th

Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Eswatini
0123196119922023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 2.49 kg per square kilometre against 1.56 kg per square kilometre in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.93 kg per square kilometre.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.6 times Central African Republic's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.

Central African Republic ranks 111th and Eswatini ranks 108th of 149 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 0.08 kg per square kilometre 0.53 kg per square kilometre 0.4499 kg per square kilometre Eswatini
1970s 0.2013 kg per square kilometre 0.8697 kg per square kilometre 0.6684 kg per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 0.499 kg per square kilometre 0.9392 kg per square kilometre 0.4402 kg per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 0.7935 kg per square kilometre 1.59 kg per square kilometre 0.7928 kg per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 1.2 kg per square kilometre 1.82 kg per square kilometre 0.6218 kg per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 1.53 kg per square kilometre 2.03 kg per square kilometre 0.4988 kg per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 1.56 kg per square kilometre 2.54 kg per square kilometre 0.9776 kg per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre, Central African Republic or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 2.49 kg per square kilometre against 1.56 kg per square kilometre in Central African Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre between Central African Republic and Eswatini?
0.93 kg per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Eswatini?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Central African Republic and Eswatini rank globally for swine — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre?
Central African Republic ranks 111th and Eswatini ranks 108th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Eswatini: Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/eswatini/">Central African Republic vs Eswatini: Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.