China vs Sao Tome and Principe: Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre

China
36.56 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
42.08 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
34th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
31st

Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre over time

  • China
  • Sao Tome and Principe
010203040196119922023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 42.08 kg per square kilometre against 36.56 kg per square kilometre in China, a difference of 5.52 kg per square kilometre.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.2 times China's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China ahead.

China ranks 34th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 31st of 149 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China averaged higher in 6 and Sao Tome and Principe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 12.02 kg per square kilometre 4.27 kg per square kilometre 7.75 kg per square kilometre China
1970s 21.73 kg per square kilometre 3.26 kg per square kilometre 18.47 kg per square kilometre China
1980s 26.8 kg per square kilometre 2.19 kg per square kilometre 24.61 kg per square kilometre China
1990s 33.2 kg per square kilometre 2.07 kg per square kilometre 31.13 kg per square kilometre China
2000s 36.23 kg per square kilometre 11.06 kg per square kilometre 25.16 kg per square kilometre China
2010s 37.81 kg per square kilometre 32.28 kg per square kilometre 5.54 kg per square kilometre China
2020s 36.7 kg per square kilometre 39.58 kg per square kilometre 2.88 kg per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre, China or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 42.08 kg per square kilometre against 36.56 kg per square kilometre in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre between China and Sao Tome and Principe?
5.52 kg per square kilometre, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Sao Tome and Principe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for swine — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre?
China ranks 34th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 31st of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Sao Tome and Principe: Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/china/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/china/sao-tome-and-principe/">China vs Sao Tome and Principe: Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.