Equatorial Guinea vs Kazakhstan: Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre

Equatorial Guinea
0.2455 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Kazakhstan
0.1398 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
130th
Kazakhstan rank
131st

Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Kazakhstan
00.20.40.60.8196119922023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.2455 kg per square kilometre against 0.1398 kg per square kilometre in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.1057 kg per square kilometre.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.8 times Kazakhstan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 130th and Kazakhstan ranks 131st of 149 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Kazakhstan in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1990s 0.182 kg per square kilometre 0.5216 kg per square kilometre 0.3397 kg per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2000s 0.2026 kg per square kilometre 0.3576 kg per square kilometre 0.155 kg per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2010s 0.224 kg per square kilometre 0.2813 kg per square kilometre 0.0573 kg per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2020s 0.2422 kg per square kilometre 0.1528 kg per square kilometre 0.0894 kg per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre, Equatorial Guinea or Kazakhstan?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0.2455 kg per square kilometre against 0.1398 kg per square kilometre in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre between Equatorial Guinea and Kazakhstan?
0.1057 kg per square kilometre, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Kazakhstan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Kazakhstan rank globally for swine — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 130th and Kazakhstan ranks 131st of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Kazakhstan: Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/kazakhstan/">Equatorial Guinea vs Kazakhstan: Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.