Equatorial Guinea vs Namibia: Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre

Equatorial Guinea
0.2455 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
0.1101 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
130th
Namibia rank
133rd

Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Namibia
00.050.10.150.20.25196119922023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.2455 kg per square kilometre against 0.1101 kg per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0.1354 kg per square kilometre.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 2.2 times Namibia's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 130th and Namibia ranks 133rd of 149 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1175 kg per square kilometre 0.0219 kg per square kilometre 0.0956 kg per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1970s 0.1393 kg per square kilometre 0.0201 kg per square kilometre 0.1192 kg per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1980s 0.1518 kg per square kilometre 0.0196 kg per square kilometre 0.1322 kg per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1990s 0.1787 kg per square kilometre 0.0197 kg per square kilometre 0.159 kg per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2000s 0.2026 kg per square kilometre 0.0432 kg per square kilometre 0.1594 kg per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0.224 kg per square kilometre 0.0901 kg per square kilometre 0.134 kg per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0.2422 kg per square kilometre 0.1158 kg per square kilometre 0.1264 kg per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre, Equatorial Guinea or Namibia?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0.2455 kg per square kilometre against 0.1101 kg per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre between Equatorial Guinea and Namibia?
0.1354 kg per square kilometre, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Namibia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Namibia rank globally for swine — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 130th and Namibia ranks 133rd of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Namibia: Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/namibia/">Equatorial Guinea vs Namibia: Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.