Equatorial Guinea vs Suriname: Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre

Equatorial Guinea
0.2455 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname
0.274 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
130th
Suriname rank
129th

Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Suriname
0.050.10.150.20.250.3196119922023

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 0.274 kg per square kilometre against 0.2455 kg per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.0285 kg per square kilometre.

That makes Suriname's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 130th and Suriname ranks 129th of 149 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 2 and Suriname in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1175 kg per square kilometre 0.0747 kg per square kilometre 0.0428 kg per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1970s 0.1393 kg per square kilometre 0.1382 kg per square kilometre 0.0011 kg per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1980s 0.1518 kg per square kilometre 0.1679 kg per square kilometre 0.0161 kg per square kilometre Suriname
1990s 0.1787 kg per square kilometre 0.218 kg per square kilometre 0.0393 kg per square kilometre Suriname
2000s 0.2026 kg per square kilometre 0.2119 kg per square kilometre 0.0093 kg per square kilometre Suriname
2010s 0.224 kg per square kilometre 0.2787 kg per square kilometre 0.0546 kg per square kilometre Suriname
2020s 0.2422 kg per square kilometre 0.2795 kg per square kilometre 0.0374 kg per square kilometre Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre, Equatorial Guinea or Suriname?
Suriname, at 0.274 kg per square kilometre against 0.2455 kg per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre between Equatorial Guinea and Suriname?
0.0285 kg per square kilometre, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Suriname?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Suriname rank globally for swine — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 130th and Suriname ranks 129th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Suriname: Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/suriname/">Equatorial Guinea vs Suriname: Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.