Kazakhstan vs Namibia: Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre

Kazakhstan
0.1398 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
0.1101 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Kazakhstan rank
131st
Namibia rank
133rd

Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Namibia
00.20.40.60.8196119922023

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 0.1398 kg per square kilometre against 0.1101 kg per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0.0297 kg per square kilometre.

That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.3 times Namibia's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.

Kazakhstan ranks 131st and Namibia ranks 133rd of 149 countries.

Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.5216 kg per square kilometre 0.0198 kg per square kilometre 0.5018 kg per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2000s 0.3576 kg per square kilometre 0.0432 kg per square kilometre 0.3144 kg per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2010s 0.2813 kg per square kilometre 0.0901 kg per square kilometre 0.1913 kg per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2020s 0.1528 kg per square kilometre 0.1158 kg per square kilometre 0.0371 kg per square kilometre Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre, Kazakhstan or Namibia?
Kazakhstan, at 0.1398 kg per square kilometre against 0.1101 kg per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre between Kazakhstan and Namibia?
0.0297 kg per square kilometre, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Namibia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Kazakhstan and Namibia rank globally for swine — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre?
Kazakhstan ranks 131st and Namibia ranks 133rd of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kazakhstan vs Namibia: Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/kazakhstan/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/kazakhstan/namibia/">Kazakhstan vs Namibia: Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.