Australia vs Singapore: Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP

Australia
0 kg per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Singapore
0 kg per US$ of GDP
in 1990
Australia rank
101st
Singapore rank
103rd

Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP over time

  • Australia
  • Singapore
0000.0010.0010.001196119922023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 0 kg per US$ of GDP against 0 kg per US$ of GDP in Singapore, a difference of 0 kg per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Singapore ahead.

Australia ranks 101st and Singapore ranks 103rd of 149 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and Singapore in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Singapore Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0003 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0007 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0004 kg per US$ of GDP Singapore
1970s 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP Singapore
1980s 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP 0 kg per US$ of GDP 0 kg per US$ of GDP Australia
1990s 0 kg per US$ of GDP 0 kg per US$ of GDP 0 kg per US$ of GDP Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — losses from manure treated (n content), per unit of gdp, Australia or Singapore?
Australia, at 0 kg per US$ of GDP against 0 kg per US$ of GDP in Singapore as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine — losses from manure treated (n content), per unit of gdp between Australia and Singapore?
0 kg per US$ of GDP, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Singapore?
30 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1990.
How do Australia and Singapore rank globally for swine — losses from manure treated (n content), per unit of gdp?
Australia ranks 101st and Singapore ranks 103rd of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Singapore: Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/australia/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/australia/singapore/">Australia vs Singapore: Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP
Unit
kg per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,190 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.