China vs Lithuania: Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP

China
0 kg per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Lithuania
0 kg per US$ of GDP
in 2023
China rank
55th
Lithuania rank
54th

Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP over time

  • China
  • Lithuania
00.0010.0010.0020.002196119922023

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 0 kg per US$ of GDP against 0 kg per US$ of GDP in China, a difference of 0 kg per US$ of GDP.

That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.2 times China's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Lithuania ahead.

China ranks 55th and Lithuania ranks 54th of 149 countries.

Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Lithuania Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0004 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0005 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP Lithuania
2000s 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP 0 kg per US$ of GDP Lithuania
2010s 0 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP 0 kg per US$ of GDP Lithuania
2020s 0 kg per US$ of GDP 0 kg per US$ of GDP 0 kg per US$ of GDP Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — losses from manure treated (n content), per unit of gdp, China or Lithuania?
Lithuania, at 0 kg per US$ of GDP against 0 kg per US$ of GDP in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine — losses from manure treated (n content), per unit of gdp between China and Lithuania?
0 kg per US$ of GDP, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Lithuania?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do China and Lithuania rank globally for swine — losses from manure treated (n content), per unit of gdp?
China ranks 55th and Lithuania ranks 54th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Lithuania: Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/china/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/china/lithuania/">China vs Lithuania: Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP
Unit
kg per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,190 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.