Australia and New Zealand vs Central America: Swine — Losses from manure treated

Australia and New Zealand
12.88 million kg
in 2023
Central America
32.58 million kg
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
24th
Central America rank
22nd

Swine — Losses from manure treated over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Central America
10.0M15.0M20.0M25.0M30.0M35.0M196119922023

How they compare

Central America currently reports 32.58 million kg against 12.88 million kg in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 19.70 million kg.

That makes Central America's figure about 2.5 times Australia and New Zealand's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Central America has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 24th and Central America ranks 22nd of 172 countries.

Central America has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Central America Difference Ahead
1960s 11.43 million kg 14.45 million kg 3.01 million kg Central America
1970s 14.15 million kg 20.85 million kg 6.70 million kg Central America
1980s 14.03 million kg 26.77 million kg 12.74 million kg Central America
1990s 14.46 million kg 24.55 million kg 10.09 million kg Central America
2000s 13.99 million kg 25.80 million kg 11.81 million kg Central America
2010s 12.28 million kg 28.24 million kg 15.97 million kg Central America
2020s 12.87 million kg 31.89 million kg 19.02 million kg Central America

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — losses from manure treated, Australia and New Zealand or Central America?
Central America, at 32.58 million kg against 12.88 million kg in Australia and New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine — losses from manure treated between Australia and New Zealand and Central America?
19.70 million kg, with Central America ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Central America?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Central America rank globally for swine — losses from manure treated?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 24th and Central America ranks 22nd of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Central America: Swine — Losses from manure treated. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/australia-and-new-zealand/central-america/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/australia-and-new-zealand/central-america/">Australia and New Zealand vs Central America: Swine — Losses from manure treated</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).