Australia vs Belarus: Swine — Losses from manure treated

Australia
11.70 million kg
in 2023
Belarus
10.72 million kg
in 2023
Australia rank
25th
Belarus rank
28th

Swine — Losses from manure treated over time

  • Australia
  • Belarus
5.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M196119922023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 11.70 million kg against 10.72 million kg in Belarus, a difference of 982,000 kg.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Australia ranks 25th and Belarus ranks 28th of 172 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Belarus in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Belarus Difference Ahead
1990s 12.63 million kg 17.30 million kg 4.66 million kg Belarus
2000s 12.31 million kg 14.99 million kg 2.68 million kg Belarus
2010s 10.90 million kg 14.33 million kg 3.42 million kg Belarus
2020s 11.67 million kg 11.15 million kg 523,825 kg Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — losses from manure treated, Australia or Belarus?
Australia, at 11.70 million kg against 10.72 million kg in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine — losses from manure treated between Australia and Belarus?
982,000 kg, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Belarus?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Australia and Belarus rank globally for swine — losses from manure treated?
Australia ranks 25th and Belarus ranks 28th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Belarus: Swine — Losses from manure treated. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 30 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/australia/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/australia/belarus/">Australia vs Belarus: Swine — Losses from manure treated</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).