Austria vs Papua New Guinea: Swine — Losses from manure treated

Austria
9.13 million kg
in 2023
Papua New Guinea
10.12 million kg
in 2023
Austria rank
31st
Papua New Guinea rank
29th

Swine — Losses from manure treated over time

  • Austria
  • Papua New Guinea
2.5M5.0M7.5M10.0M12.5M15.0M196119922023

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 10.12 million kg against 9.13 million kg in Austria, a difference of 992,680 kg.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Austria's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Austria ahead.

Austria ranks 31st and Papua New Guinea ranks 29th of 172 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 6 and Papua New Guinea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 10.55 million kg 3.04 million kg 7.50 million kg Austria
1970s 12.72 million kg 3.70 million kg 9.01 million kg Austria
1980s 14.20 million kg 4.40 million kg 9.80 million kg Austria
1990s 13.50 million kg 6.18 million kg 7.32 million kg Austria
2000s 11.81 million kg 8.45 million kg 3.36 million kg Austria
2010s 10.60 million kg 9.54 million kg 1.06 million kg Austria
2020s 9.76 million kg 9.91 million kg 157,735 kg Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — losses from manure treated, Austria or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 10.12 million kg against 9.13 million kg in Austria as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine — losses from manure treated between Austria and Papua New Guinea?
992,680 kg, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Papua New Guinea?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Austria and Papua New Guinea rank globally for swine — losses from manure treated?
Austria ranks 31st and Papua New Guinea ranks 29th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs Papua New Guinea: Swine — Losses from manure treated. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/austria/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/austria/papua-new-guinea/">Austria vs Papua New Guinea: Swine — Losses from manure treated</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).