Bhutan vs Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of: Swine — Losses from manure treated

Bhutan
32,047 kg
in 2023
Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of
34,008 kg
in 2023
Bhutan rank
137th
Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of rank
135th

Swine — Losses from manure treated over time

  • Bhutan
  • Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k196119922023

How they compare

Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of currently reports 34,008 kg against 32,047 kg in Bhutan, a difference of 1,961 kg.

That makes Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of's figure about 1.1 times Bhutan's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Bhutan ahead.

Bhutan ranks 137th and Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of ranks 135th of 169 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 2 and Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s 54,586 kg 20,364 kg 34,222 kg Bhutan
2000s 35,338 kg 25,659 kg 9,679 kg Bhutan
2010s 19,622 kg 31,041 kg 11,418 kg Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of
2020s 27,919 kg 33,232 kg 5,312 kg Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — losses from manure treated, Bhutan or Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of?
Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of, at 34,008 kg against 32,047 kg in Bhutan as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine — losses from manure treated between Bhutan and Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of?
1,961 kg, with Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Bhutan and Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of rank globally for swine — losses from manure treated?
Bhutan ranks 137th and Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of ranks 135th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of: Swine — Losses from manure treated. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/bhutan/ethiopia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/bhutan/ethiopia/">Bhutan vs Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of: Swine — Losses from manure treated</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).