Botswana vs Tokelau: Swine — Losses from manure treated

Botswana
7,817 kg
in 2023
Tokelau
11,025 kg
in 2023
Botswana rank
171st
Tokelau rank
168th

Swine — Losses from manure treated over time

  • Botswana
  • Tokelau
05.0k10.0k15.0k196119922023

How they compare

Tokelau currently reports 11,025 kg against 7,817 kg in Botswana, a difference of 3,208 kg.

That makes Tokelau's figure about 1.4 times Botswana's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 171st and Tokelau ranks 168th of 188 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 5 and Tokelau in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Tokelau Difference Ahead
1960s 6,665 kg 3,105 kg 3,560 kg Botswana
1970s 12,225 kg 4,376 kg 7,849 kg Botswana
1980s 8,089 kg 4,854 kg 3,234 kg Botswana
1990s 5,445 kg 4,736 kg 708.73 kg Botswana
2000s 8,392 kg 4,736 kg 3,656 kg Botswana
2010s 2,916 kg 5,355 kg 2,438 kg Tokelau
2020s 5,987 kg 13,400 kg 7,413 kg Tokelau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — losses from manure treated, Botswana or Tokelau?
Tokelau, at 11,025 kg against 7,817 kg in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine — losses from manure treated between Botswana and Tokelau?
3,208 kg, with Tokelau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Tokelau?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Tokelau rank globally for swine — losses from manure treated?
Botswana ranks 171st and Tokelau ranks 168th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Tokelau: Swine — Losses from manure treated. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/botswana/tokelau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/botswana/tokelau/">Botswana vs Tokelau: Swine — Losses from manure treated</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).