China, Hong Kong SAR vs Congo: Swine — Losses from manure treated

China, Hong Kong SAR
91,141 kg
in 2023
Congo
94,989 kg
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
122nd
Congo rank
120th

Swine — Losses from manure treated over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Congo
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 94,989 kg against 91,141 kg in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 3,848 kg.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 122nd and Congo ranks 120th of 172 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 6 and Congo in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Congo Difference Ahead
1960s 231,146 kg 22,788 kg 208,359 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
1970s 350,072 kg 36,506 kg 313,566 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
1980s 345,624 kg 31,887 kg 313,737 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
1990s 130,261 kg 45,524 kg 84,737 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 146,596 kg 61,862 kg 84,734 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s 106,699 kg 87,707 kg 18,993 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 91,141 kg 93,906 kg 2,766 kg Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — losses from manure treated, China, Hong Kong SAR or Congo?
Congo, at 94,989 kg against 91,141 kg in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine — losses from manure treated between China, Hong Kong SAR and Congo?
3,848 kg, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Congo?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Congo rank globally for swine — losses from manure treated?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 122nd and Congo ranks 120th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Congo: Swine — Losses from manure treated. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/china-hong-kong-sar/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/china-hong-kong-sar/congo-rep/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Congo: Swine — Losses from manure treated</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).