China, Hong Kong SAR vs Montenegro: Swine — Losses from manure treated

China, Hong Kong SAR
91,141 kg
in 2023
Montenegro
90,262 kg
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
122nd
Montenegro rank
124th

Swine — Losses from manure treated over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Montenegro
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k196119922023

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 91,141 kg against 90,262 kg in Montenegro, a difference of 879 kg.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 122nd and Montenegro ranks 124th of 172 countries.

China, Hong Kong SAR has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Montenegro Difference Ahead
2000s 122,423 kg 41,772 kg 80,651 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s 106,699 kg 87,131 kg 19,568 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 91,141 kg 90,262 kg 878.83 kg China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine — losses from manure treated, China, Hong Kong SAR or Montenegro?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at 91,141 kg against 90,262 kg in Montenegro as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine — losses from manure treated between China, Hong Kong SAR and Montenegro?
879 kg, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Montenegro?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Montenegro rank globally for swine — losses from manure treated?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 122nd and Montenegro ranks 124th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Montenegro: Swine — Losses from manure treated. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/china-hong-kong-sar/montenegro/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/china-hong-kong-sar/montenegro/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Montenegro: Swine — Losses from manure treated</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine — Losses from manure treated (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
225 places, 12,930 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).